Communicating up and down the chain….
As I sit here I am thinking about the projects that I have been working on for the past couple of months. I need to let everyone know what is going on, but there are at least 3 different levels of personnel that I need to keep in the loop and each has their own needs. This can make things complex to report and could end up taking me several hours a week to complete (not good when I don’t get paid for the time I spend on status reports).
My first thought is to ask why? Why do these people need to know what I am doing and what the heck do they need to know about it? Should I be putting everything I do down (as a consultant – yes!) or should I be giving summaries? The answer is simple – it depends on the person I am reporting to.
So you understand I have 6 people that are subordinates or equals, then I have a direct manager at the company. Then I have several independent managers that are at different levels in the organization that I consult with and am responsible to. As well there are other independent consultants in the company that need to know what I am doing on their projects. Also I have to report my time to someone. So I really have 5 different types of people to keep informed as to what I am doing for them, but there are only 3 levels of detail that I need to report.
5 Types of People but only 3 Levels?
Yes, that is what I said, some are up the chain, others are equal and some are down the chain. Lets start with down the chain and lateral on the chain.
I have 6 people that I work with directly on a daily basis that need to know where things stand at, each of the individuals have their own projects and some of them cross with mine, some I manage, some I don’t. So this is a type of person (a subordinate, 1 of 5) and represents only 1 level of 3.
They need the details of what I am doing, what I am concerned with in their work, the Project Plan, the status of their tasks and any known issues that have to be worked on by them.
Then there is a direct manager at the company that I have to report to. In my case she handles my time card and is involved to some level with every project I am as well as others. Her time is valuable, but she needs to know everything she can about all of the different things that I am involved with. She is another type of person (2 of 5) and at a different level (2 of 3 levels) than subordinates.
One other point here is that problems need to be brought up with her, this is an opportunity to get issues out there and document them so that I have a record of it, this keeps us from pointing fingers later.
Direct managers need the details of each project, the time spent, the status, new project issues, existing/open issues, legal issues, closed items and concerns. Sometimes you might want to report financial issues here as well, that will depend on your situation.
I stated earlier that I work with other consulting houses as well at the same company. My role with them is very similar as it is with the direct manager in that I help supervise their staff, but also work with their project managers. These are completely different types of people (they can be an equal, subordinates and sometimes managers) yet they deserve the same level of detail that I provide subordinates and the same issues I present to the manager, but only for their direct projects, so they are at the same level as both a subordinate and direct manager, but they are project specific. This represents 2 types of people (3 and 4 of 5) but they have the same level as the subordinates and manager above (1 and 2 of 3 levels as above).
Status reports here, ensuring that they are project specific.
Finally information that is pushed up the chain needs to be summarized and filtered. These are the corporate executives that are either project champions or owners, sometimes they are the president of the company, others they are VP’s or CxO levels. Given this, they need to know individual project statuses, in summary form, and anything in the unresolved problems category that are not capable of being resolved between the managers and staff (including other contract houses). I also include anything in the legal area here (they should be informed of these details) and anything in the financial aspect of the projects that I work on. This is the last type of person (5 of 5) and the final level (3 of 3).
So what do they need?
For each person it is a bit different. Keeping it simple can be hard to do, but it can be done and it can be simplified from the entry point of view.
Here is a simple format that covers a lot of ground quickly it leaves the time card outstanding:
|
Project/Component
|
Estimated Length
|
Used Time
|
Remaining Time
|
% Complete
|
| XRay/Imaging |
179 wk
|
100 wk
|
79 wk
|
76% Ahead
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Use Case Tool |
30 wk
|
3 wk
|
27 wk
|
10% – Behind
|
| 1.1-Design |
5 wk
|
2.5 wk
|
2.5 wk
|
50% on-time
|
| 1.2-Open/Close |
10 wk
|
0 wk
|
10 wk
|
not started
|
| 1.3-File Format |
8 wk
|
1 wk
|
7 wk
|
13% on-time
|
| 1.4-Print |
7 wk
|
2 wk
|
6 wk
|
on-time
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Estimating Tool |
5 wk
|
2.5 wk
|
2.5 wk
|
50% on-time
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Legal Concerns: |
|
| XRay/Imaging |
Component must be purchased, licensing is an issue for DICOM |
|
|
| Outstanding Issues: |
|
| Use Case Tool |
Concerns with on going issues between usage and needs, plus design is still not solid. |
|
|
I use Excel and create PDF’s for each group, I used roll-ups to keep it simple. The time card is an addition to this and it is the only thing that I keep separated. In the above, the roll-ups are:
The Use Case tool, rolls up for execs.
The Legal Concerns, rolls up for subordinates.
Simple and effective, updating takes only a few minutes a week. Formulas are used to cover ground, I leave that to you to figure out (I cannot give away everything).